• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Data / Women’s Health Strategy: our input to the consultation

Women’s Health Strategy: our input to the consultation

14th June 2021 by FPFW

women's health strategy

In March 2021 the Department for Health and Social care called for evidence to help develop its Women’s Health Strategy Fair Play For Women made this written submission.

1. Who we are

Fair Play For Women Ltd is a campaigning and consultancy organisation which raises awareness, provides evidence and analysis and works to protect the sex-based rights of women and girls in the UK. Founded in 2017, our work is focused on understanding when and how gender-and sex-based rights conflict in law and policy-making. Our aim is to ensure that everyone’s needs are fairly balanced and that women and girls are not overlooked in good policy-making. 

We believe in compassion and fairness for all. We support the rights of trans people to live in safety and to be treated fairly. We also support the rights of women and girls, and this is our focus. 

2. Summary

We welcome this consultation about women’s health, which recognises the material reality of sexed bodies, and the consequential differences between the sexes, both in their health issues and in their experiences in the healthcare and social care systems.  

We share the concerns recently raised by the Office for Statistics Regulation that the conflation of sex and gender, which is already occurring, compromises statistics and hence information and understanding. This is particularly concerning in healthcare. The entire strategy relies on knowing the difference between males and females, and recording it correctly. Yet we know that this is not being done. This is now becoming urgent to address.

The conflation of biological sex with self-declared gender identity is also undermining the stated intention of the NHS to provide single-sex in-patient accommodation. This, and the impact on patient access to female HCPs on request, will not have a positive impact on women’s health, and may well have a negative impact.

Reversing the conflation of sex and gender identity in medical records and in practice for both patients and staff is therefore an essential and increasingly urgent foundational step for the government’s strategy on women’s health and care provision.

Recommendations: 

2.1 It is essential that birth sex and self-identified gender are not conflated in data collection and record-keeping.

2.2 Single-sex accommodation must mean single sex – biological sex – and not single gender or self-declared sex.

2.3 No woman who requests a same-sex clinician or social care provider should be shamed for this; nor should a trans-identifying male be presented as a female to a woman who has requested a female HCP or a woman. 

3. Areas of concern

3.1 Data collection and record-keeping. 

It is essential that birth sex and self-identified gender are not conflated in data collection and record-keeping. It becomes impossible to rely on and act upon data regarding the specific issues affecting women and girls if those data are distorted by males self-identifying into them, and being permitted to do so. Biological sex remains a critical variable for a wide range of applications. 

In order to make progress on the development and execution of any strategy relating to women’s health, it is necessary to correctly record the sex of patients, participants in research studies and drug trials, and so on. If patient records are to be used for analysis, then ensuring correct recording of biological sex in NHS patient records is essential. But this is not being done. For example, we know there are very substantial differences in the incidence of some mental health issues between the sexes. But the latest planned changes to the Mental Health Services Data Set will replace sex with self-declared gender identity. This will destroy the value of these data for analysis of the differing mental health issues and outcomes for men and women, and for boys and girls. 

Separately, the NHS inclusion of fields for both sex and “gender” in electronic patient records reflects their dual use: for medical reference by clinicians who need to know a person’s sex and by customer-facing medical staff who wish to address individuals according to customer preference. However, it is reportedly failing in practice because staff understand “gender” to be synonymous with “sex”, and are therefore recording data in one field only. 

3.2 Single-sex accommodation

It is widely accepted that, for reasons of dignity and privacy, single-sex healthcare provision is often desirable. The value of single-sex wards is explained at length in the NHS England document, Delivering Same Sex Accommodation. But Annex B of this document undermines it entirely, since it declares that anyone may self-identify their sex and be accommodated by preferred gender, even if this is not their biological sex. Whilst this may be desirable for that patient, it results in all other patients finding themselves in mixed-sex accommodation while being assured it is same-sex. This has resulted in distressing experiences for women in hospital, such as those who had a male alongside them viewing images of child sex abuse (behaviour which is vanishingly rare among females), or the woman fearful of men being told she was with women only in a mental health unit despite the evidence of her own eyes. Whether someone has a GRC is not visible to others. Whether they were born male or female invariably is. But in any case the current policy allows anyone to declare themselves as female, regardless of whether they have changed their sex legally.

3.3. Same-sex clinicians and social care providers

The NHS recognises that some women prefer intimate healthcare procedures to be provided by a female doctor or nurse. Similarly, in social care it is widely accepted that many people will prefer same-sex carers. There are many reasons why a woman may request a female HCP, including a history of assault or associated trauma, religious or cultural taboos, or sensitivity about their body. Losing confidence that such a request will be met can only be detrimental to women’s experiences in the healthcare system, and may lead to reluctance to come forward for screening, for example.

Simply asserting that anyone who identifies as a woman is a woman does not work in situations where there is hands-on contact between healthcare or social care provider and patient. While most of us might struggle to define what makes a person male or female, the ability to distinguish between the sexes is acquired early in childhood and appears to be instinctive and highly accurate. It does not rely on sight of birth records or intimate body parts.  It exists even if it is not recorded.

This matters for the privacy and dignity of men and women alike, but it is particularly of concern for women because of the fear of sexual assault (sexual assault by women is very rare, less than 2% of UK convictions). Indeed, some women may experience contact by a male as an assault, particularly if she has requested a female practitioner. Yet women who make such a request are being demonised.

There is a clear conflict of interest between the wish of a doctor who seeks gender reassignment for recognition in their new gender and those of that doctor’s patients who request a same-sex clinician. The GMC practice of allowing doctors to change their registered sex on request respects the privacy of the clinician, but this may create difficulties for patients who expect a female clinician but see someone whom they perceive as male. This conflict needs to be acknowledged and addressed in ways that work for women as well as for HCPs. Even in cases where a doctor is known to have changed gender, and appears to be accepted, as in this example of an Asian doctor and many patients from the Indian sub-continent, it is possible that some patients will not feel able to refuse to validate the doctor’s preferences. As Nadine Dorries has pointed out, many women are not assertive with doctors as they feel they must defer to the doctor. This effect is likely to be amplified in those cultures where males are higher status than women. Therefore, the system needs to ensure that access to same-sex HCPs does not rely on women being sufficiently assertive or risking causing offence to a respected practitioner, but is fully legitimised and respected by everyone working within the health and care systems.

https://fairplayforwomen.com/

June 2021

Filed Under: Data, Policy guidance Tagged With: health

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings