• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Materials
    • Transgender Media Guide
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2020
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Prisons / Why is a female prisoner suing the UK government over its policy on transgender prisoners?

Why is a female prisoner suing the UK government over its policy on transgender prisoners?

11th November 2020 by FPFW

A female prisoner has been granted a Judicial Review of transgender prisoner policy. She is bringing an indirect discrimination claim on the grounds of sex. Her legal team will argue that two transgender policies do not adequately consider the detrimental impact on female prisoners and should be quashed.

The two prison policies to be covered by the transgender prisoner judicial review are:

  • The care and management of transgender prisoners
  • The special unit for high-risk transgender prisoners located at Downview women’s prison

Both policies were published in 2019 following the sexual assault of two women by Karen White, a male transgender prisoner, while on remand in a women’s prison. Despite some welcome improvements designed to safeguard women they do not go far enough.

The legal framework exists that would allow the MOJ to exclude all male-born prisoners from women’s prisons, irrespective of transgender status. This includes both the separate-sex exceptions in the Equality Act 2010 and the Prison Rules 1999. The MOJ chose not to use them.

 

 

Transgender prison policy is not fair to women in prison

This means under current rules it is still possible for male-born prisoners to share communal space with women, including trans prisoners with a history of sexual or physical abuse of women. The MOJ failed to consult properly on the detrimental impact on the female prisoners. The legal team will argue that the resulting policy indirectly discriminates against the women in prison and that current policy guidance should be scrapped and redrawn. This time including a comprehensive analysis of all the risks and harms to women and in full and effective consultation with experts, advocates for female prisoners and female prisoners themselves.

The transgender prisoner judicial review began on 28th October 2020 but was adjourned because of the late submission of new evidence by the MOJ defense team. The new evidence contained legal advice given to the Minister of Justice before he signed off the transgender prison policy. Due to ministerial privilege’s this advice had been redacted in the document submitted to the courts. The court ordered the MOJ’s legal team to ask that the Ministerial privilege is waived or for the Minister to explain to the court why he would not.

The court hearing is expected to resume in December 2020 or January 2021.

 

Read more:

Karen White convicted of sexually assaulting two women in prison

Half of all known transgender prisoners require max security or specialist sex offender prisons.

Fair Play For Women asked women in prison what they thought about sharing with male sex offenders. Why didn’t the MOJ?

Fair Play For Women | All transgender prison articles

 


You can help to defend female rights by making a donation. Fair Play For Women receives no formal or government funding to do the vital work we do. We rely completely on donations made by our supporters.

DONATE NOW

Filed Under: Prisons

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Violence against women and girls: our response to the Home Office call for evidence
  • What do we know about the research ONS used to justify changing the meaning of sex in the census?
  • Legal grounds: Fair Play For Women v The Office For National Statistics
  • Sex in the Census: Our legal challenge to stop the ONS redefining sex
  • ONS boss reverses commitment to collecting high quality sex data in Census.

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Female inmate suing the government
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • A scientist reviews the IOC’s transgender inclusion policy
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Testosterone reduction policies
  • Rachel McKinnon transwoman cyclist
  • You can help

Making policy and the law

  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Equality impact analysis advice
  • Public Sector Equality Duty
  • Changing room policy advice
  • Scottish Government omits women’s evidence
  • The Scottish bill that stole the word woman
  • What can I do now?

© 2021 · Fair Play For Women