• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Prisons / Why is a female prisoner suing the UK government over its policy on transgender prisoners?

Why is a female prisoner suing the UK government over its policy on transgender prisoners?

11th November 2020 by FPFW

A female prisoner has been granted a Judicial Review of transgender prisoner policy. She is bringing an indirect discrimination claim on the grounds of sex. Her legal team will argue that two transgender policies do not adequately consider the detrimental impact on female prisoners and should be quashed.

The two prison policies to be covered by the transgender prisoner judicial review are:

  • The care and management of transgender prisoners
  • The special unit for high-risk transgender prisoners located at Downview women’s prison

Both policies were published in 2019 following the sexual assault of two women by Karen White, a male transgender prisoner, while on remand in a women’s prison. Despite some welcome improvements designed to safeguard women they do not go far enough.

The legal framework exists that would allow the MOJ to exclude all male-born prisoners from women’s prisons, irrespective of transgender status. This includes both the separate-sex exceptions in the Equality Act 2010 and the Prison Rules 1999. The MOJ chose not to use them.

 

 

Transgender prison policy is not fair to women in prison

This means under current rules it is still possible for male-born prisoners to share communal space with women, including trans prisoners with a history of sexual or physical abuse of women. The MOJ failed to consult properly on the detrimental impact on the female prisoners. The legal team will argue that the resulting policy indirectly discriminates against the women in prison and that current policy guidance should be scrapped and redrawn. This time including a comprehensive analysis of all the risks and harms to women and in full and effective consultation with experts, advocates for female prisoners and female prisoners themselves.

The case was heard in March 2021. Judgment is to be handled down on 2nd July 2021 at 10.30.

Watch this space for news and commentary

 

Read more:

Karen White convicted of sexually assaulting two women in prison

Half of all known transgender prisoners require max security or specialist sex offender prisons.

Fair Play For Women asked women in prison what they thought about sharing with male sex offenders. Why didn’t the MOJ?

Fair Play For Women | All transgender prison articles

 


You can help to defend female rights by making a donation. Fair Play For Women receives no formal or government funding to do the vital work we do. We rely completely on donations made by our supporters.

DONATE NOW

Filed Under: Prisons

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • World Athletics announcement is a game-changer
  • Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.
  • Transgender inclusion in sport is not ‘fair’ when all champions will be young adult males
  • Female-only sport: what does the law say?
  • A speech to the Spanish Senate on fairness in women’s sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Sport timeline: how did we get here?
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings