• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2021
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Language / Why are women fighting back against the Census?

Why are women fighting back against the Census?

27th February 2021 by FPFW

Sex matters.

Birth sex is a simple and important piece of information and we think the ONS should not be afraid to ask about it.

Data on sex matters. It matters most to women and girls. We need it.

If we don’t have good data on sex we can’t monitor inequalities due to sex.

And if we can’t measure it we can’t make good policies to remedy it.

What’s happened?

This year there will be two questions in the Census.

One on sex and one on gender identity.

That’s great – an opportunity to get good data on both concepts.

Good data for women and girls and good data for the transgender community.

There really shouldn’t have been an issue, but…

Last minute U-turn.

A few weeks before Census day the ONS changed its plans and said it will now encourage trans people to answer BOTH questions with their gender identity.

That means putting their gender identity as the answer to both the sex and the gender identity question.

That sudden change of heart does not look like evidence-based decision-making.

That looks like caving into pressure by lobby groups.

That’s why we need this policy decision reviewed in open court by a judge.

The public needs to trust that the National Statistician prioritizes good data and is not unduly influenced.

Lots of people agree with us.

We’ve raised over £100,000 in 2 weeks to fund this legal challenge.

That’s over 3200 ordinary people putting their hands in their pockets to help.

This issue clearly matter to people. It matters women a lot.

The issue of the Census guidance has also been raised in the House of Lords.

 

Labour peer Lord Hunt said: ‘The ONS has caved into bullying—pathetic. The head of the ONS was interviewed, I think on the “Today” programme, and said that it was not going down the path it has now chosen. However, it has caved in, as many public bodies do, because they come under aggressive attack on social media and are accused of transphobia. The Government remain absolutely silent.’

Baroness Noakes, a Tory, said: ‘Some organisations, deliberately or carelessly conflate sex and gender. The ONS for example has dug itself into this hole for the upcoming census. With the likely result that inaccurate statistical data will be coming from that about women.’

Crossbench peer Baroness Fox said: ‘There is now a huge furore about the politicised wording of the questions in the census. The census is a hugely important enquiry to gather factual data and accurate statistics the gender identity lobby has been working hard to obfuscate the issue by mangling sex with gender identity.’

 

But what if some trans people find it offensive or upsetting to be asked the question “What is your sex?”

There are lots of sensitive questions in the Census.

Lots of hard-to-reach groups. This is nothing new for the ONS.

The normal way is to do outreach campaigns to explain the benefits. Help people feel comfortable answering the question honestly and lawfully.

They didn’t do this for the trans community.

Instead they decided the only way to get trans people to answer the sex question is to fudge the answer.

Trans people benefit from good data on sex too. This approach lets everyone down.

And remember, there are strict rules around confidentiality in the Census. Personal data is never revealed. No one gets ‘outed’.

We all have to answer private and personal question in the Census.

Lots of information we can feel uncomfortable sharing but we do because it is private and necessary.

Haven’t trans people always answered according to their gender identity?

We don’t really know – it’s never been studied.

Even if some did answer past Censuses according to their lived sex instead of birth sex the numbers will have been tiny.

In recent years there’s been a huge rise in people identifying as transgender.

When the GRA was discussed in parliament in 2004 it was estimated there were just 5,000 trans people in the UK.

Today people estimate there are 500,000 trans people.

Those types of numbers can make a big difference.

The Census is the most comprehensive and expensive data collection exercise there is.

The tax payer is spending £1 billion on it. It needs to be accurate and it needs to be useful.

That means collecting the richest data set possible.

There are many scenarios when even a small misclassification of males into the female category makes a huge difference to the outcomes.

In crime for example, there are 13,000 male sex offenders in prison. But only around 100 females.

So if just 0.5% of those males get counted as female that almost doubles the female total.

That makes the data easily to misunderstand and it is.

In a recent File On Four documentary they revealed that the number of women reported to the police for allegedly sexually abusing children had doubled in five years.

But police record gender identity and NOT birth sex. So we simply do not know how many of these ‘female paedophiles’ are in fact male.

That’s because important information on sex has been lost.

It’s not just us saying this – 80 top data scientists, including 50 Professors, wrote to the ONS telling them not to conflate sex and gender identity. They’ve been ignored.

And remember, the ONS sets the gold standard for data collection.

Everyone follows what the ONS does. So if ONS can’t ask about birth sex no one will!

Medical researchers say they need information on birth sex but are worried they can’t ask this anymore.

They look to the ONS for the lead on this.

We need a clear signal from National Statistician that it’s OK and lawful to ask “what sex were you born”.

Stonewall says it’s clear and inclusive guidance for trans people.

The Census already is inclusive. This time there is a new gender identity question just for trans people.

There’s no need to record gender identity in another question anymore.

The purpose of guidance is not to be ‘inclusive’.

It’s also not clear. ONS are telling trans people to put what’s on ANY of their official documents.

What most people don’t realise is that most trans people will have different gender markers on different documents.

Male on birth certificate or Female on passport – it’s very easy to get a passport changed – you can get a letter on-line from a GP

So which document should trans people refer to?

What’s the point of guidance that doesn’t help you narrow down the answers!

That’s quite important because it’s a criminal offence to put the wrong answer.

 

 

ONS doesn’t have the power to redefine sex.

Government decided – after a long public consultation – that sex should NOT be a matter of self-identification.

ONS has ignored that and says that it can!

We say their definition of sex is unlawful. The definition of sex is a matter for parliament or the courts not the ONS.

They have refused to take down the guidance so we must stop them in the High Court.

The erasure of women’s rights is real and we need to take emergency action to stop it.

If we lose the meaning of the word sex we lose our ability to fight for our sex-based rights

Thank you to the thousands of people who donated to our crowdfunder so that we can fund this legal challenge.

DONATE NOW

 

 

Filed Under: Data, Language

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Press regulator is failing women with approach to transgender coverage
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Women’s cycling race saved after campaigns raise public support
  • How transgender inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • Sex-based rights groups make formal bid to sponsor women’s cycle race

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • Sport policy – what now for UK sports?
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2022 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings