• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2021
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Data / Update: What have we been doing since we won the Census case in March?

Update: What have we been doing since we won the Census case in March?

23rd May 2021 by FPFW

sex in the census

It’s been two months since we won our court case against the Office for National Statistics on the Census. Here’s what we’ve been doing since then, and what happens next.

What next after the Census case?

The Census in Scotland: We won in England and Wales, and the Northern Ireland Census fell into line. But the organisation responsible for the Scottish Census, the NRS, is still planning a full self-ID approach to the sex question in its census in March 2022; one that is even more extreme than the ONS had planned. We have now written to the NRS setting out the legal arguments for why they would also be acting unlawfully if guidance on the sex question is issued on the basis intended. NRS have told us they are now considering the implications for Scotland’s Census. We are keeping a close eye on what they do next.

Helping the ONS to do better: We have also registered a formal notification to the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) that the ONS approach to the Census constituted a breach of the Code of Practice for Statistics. The OSR has confirmed that it will be reviewing the actions taken by ONS with regard to the guidance for the sex question against the standards of the Code. It is vital that lessons are learned so that this sort of thing doesn’t happen again. Read our report on how we took the ONS to court and won.

Mental Health Data: Just last week we heard that biological sex is being replaced by gender identity in an important NHS data set, called the Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS). It seems incredible that healthcare providers would think this is a good thing, but it is being planned to start from October this year. The justification is “alignment with the Census” – that is, with the original approach, which we stopped. But this NHS work was already in motion, with self-declared gender identity being promoted as more important than birth sex. NHS representatives supported this approach at the ONS roundtable meeting back in June 2020. We are challenging this, of course. But it shows how insidious and widespread this problem is.

Getting this problem fixed from the top: In February this year we wrote to the OSR to point out how data on sex and gender identity are being conflated, and how harmful this is, particularly to women and girls. All the census authorities are answerable to the OSR for their data standards. The OSR has since published draft guidance on the issue, and opened a consultation on it. Our response to the OSR consultation is here. 

Improving UK data standards on sex and gender identity would be a major step forward. Better data will help with making better policies. Meanwhile, we still have to fight to stop changes that have already been set in motion, like the MHSDS.


Women in prison: waiting for the judgement on the judicial review.

Since 2017 Fair Play For Women have been fighting to protect women in prison from the further injustice of being imprisoned with males. In February 2021, three high court judges heard a legal challenge to the policy that lets that happen. That is how slowly the wheels of justice turn, as the timeline shows. The judgement on that case could come any day, or it may take weeks or even months. But we are seeing glimmers of hope in other policy discussions, in which the prison authorities in England and Wales have consulted us and other groups who’ve spoken up for women in prison. This is a good sign. We work hard to support and encourage organisations to develop good policies that are fair for all. Legal action, which is so time-consuming, expensive and (usually) slow, is always our last resort.

Through Freedom of Information requests we have discovered how this unbalanced policy was developed, with the emotional needs of trans-identifying males being given priority, and seemingly no thought at all for the needs or well-being of women. Here’s the full shocking story.

Have a look at the prisons timeline to see how we got here.


We are working hard on sport too.

Our work in sport is non-stop. We are constantly in touch with national and international sports bodies, pointing out the errors in their thinking, the flaws in their policies, the unfairness to women and the risks inherent in the approaches they are adopting. This is not just the risk that women and girls get injured, it includes the risk of legal action against the sports bodies themselves. This is certainly the case where UK law has not been followed or has been interpreted incorrectly. Since March we have had numerous meetings, and written to national sports bodies including the RFU, ECB, World Athletics, British Cycling and Bowls England. 

Read our consultation response to the RFU 

Our consultation response to British Cycling

Our recent letter to World Athletics, whom we’ve worked with before.


Working behind the scenes.

Most of the work we do happens behind the scenes. We try to engage with policy-makers and decision-makers to show them where there are policies that need to change because of unfairness or risk to women and girls. This work is a bit like diplomacy – achieving change often means keeping quiet about who is willing to meet with us and to listen to our input. Barely a week goes by when we don’t have contact with someone in an organisation across the political, legal, sporting and media landscapes  in our efforts to make change happen. This can be more effective than calling them out publicly or taking them to court, though sometimes, as with the ONS, it’s the only option left.

More legal action?

The high court win against the ONS, and their capitulation and offer to settle “reasonable costs” (this is standard legal terminology) was a fantastic high point for us all. The process now is for us to get our money back – we claim our costs, they object, it goes back and forth via the courts –   which can take up to a year. Frustratingly, we won’t get it all back. That just doesn’t happen. There will be a shortfall, likely tens of thousands of pounds, which will come out of the legal fund to which you all contributed through the crowdfunder. But we do have a substantial fund all the same which means we can afford to get expert legal advice on other matters, like sport. So far we have invested over £10,000 on important legal analysis since our ONS win. So… watch this space! We will be able to reveal more in the coming months.

With my thanks for your support and encouragement. We could not do this without you.

Dr Nicola Williams

 


You can help to defend female rights by making a donation. Fair Play For Women receives no formal or government funding to support the vital work we do. We rely completely on donations made by our supporters.

DONATE NOW

Filed Under: Data, Judicial Review

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Sport policy: do we need more evidence?
  • UK Sport is recommending Inclusive Employers, whose report for British Triathlon was biased and wrong
  • Rugby Union and Rugby League do the right thing
  • Levelling down: How asking the wrong question led to bad sport policy
  • Penny Mordaunt claims “I’ve never supported self-ID”

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • Sport policy – what now for UK sports?
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2022 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings