• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Materials
    • Transgender Media Guide
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2020
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Judicial Review / We stopped the ONS redefining sex in the Census – what happens next?

We stopped the ONS redefining sex in the Census – what happens next?

1st April 2021 by FPFW

What happens now?

The legal action is over for now but the process is not yet complete. As you’ll know, the ONS legal position was considered very weak at the permission hearing on 9 March, at which they were ordered by the court to change the guidance immediately, which the ONS did the same afternoon. Understandably keen to avoid a full judicial review, they approached us with an offer to settle the case. Following negotiation via our legal teams, this involved them signing a court order agreeing that UK Census law does not allow them to redefine sex as self-identified gender. It also included their agreement to pay all reasonable costs. Our legal costs to date have been £92,000. There will now be a standard process of assessment to enable a final settlement to be reached. Any shortfall between our legal team’s claim and the ONS settlement will be met from our crowdfunded total. This is a huge win, both on the principle and in the fact that the ONS could not defend their position. We simply could not have done it without your generous support of the crowdfunder giving us the confidence that losing would not have bankrupted us.

What are the wider implications?

After our ruling, the Northern Ireland Census authorities immediately and quietly fell into line, amending their guidance to match that required by Mr Justice Swift in London. We are now evaluating the legal implications for the Scottish census planned for 2022.  We will announce any plans regarding this shortly. The Census case was specifically about the law governing the Census, so it does not set a legal precedent more widely. But it provides a strong signal that sex in the law does mean legal, not self-identified, sex, and that it is hard to argue otherwise. It also signals that resistance is mounting against the casual dismissal of women’s sex-based rights, and that those who listen only to trans activists could end up looking very foolish, very publicly.

A note on the financials

We raised £101,000 exactly. After Crowdfunder.co.uk deducts its fees + VAT, we received £93,985.79. As we promised when we launched the crowdfunder, any surplus will be put towards other Fair Play For Women campaigns. We are confident that the final costs award will leave us with a valuable fighting fund, although probably not enough to fight a whole new legal action if that becomes necessary. We will update with the detail once the cost assessment is complete. This is likely to be a couple of months away. In the meantime, we have already instructed our legal team to undertake the necessary evaluation work to enable us to prioritise and prepare for our next legal challenges.

Thank you again for your support

We are continuing our work in our key focus areas of prisons, sport, language and data. This case was a very welcome victory and we celebrated for a day – now it’s back to work!

You can help to defend female rights by making a donation. Fair Play For Women receives no formal or government funding to support the vital work we do. We rely completely on donations made by our supporters.
DONATE NOW

Filed Under: Judicial Review

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • We stopped the ONS redefining sex in the Census – what happens next?
  • England Rugby’s Transgender policy proposal – External Consultation by the RFU
  • An open letter to trustees and chief executives: you’re being taken for a ride
  • Fair Play For Women wins High Court challenge and judge orders sex must not be self-identified in the Census
  • Who’s behind the government losing sight of reality?

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Female inmate suing the government
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • A scientist reviews the IOC’s transgender inclusion policy
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Testosterone reduction policies
  • Rachel McKinnon transwoman cyclist
  • You can help

Making policy and the law

  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Equality impact analysis advice
  • Public Sector Equality Duty
  • Changing room policy advice
  • Scottish Government omits women’s evidence
  • The Scottish bill that stole the word woman
  • What can I do now?

© 2021 · Fair Play For Women