• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Prisons / Transgender prison policy: judicial review ruling confirms trans rights do conflict with women’s rights

Transgender prison policy: judicial review ruling confirms trans rights do conflict with women’s rights

6th July 2021 by FPFW

prison

On Friday 2 July, the High Court declared that the MOJ’s transgender prison policy to house high-risk male-born transgender prisoners in female prison is ‘capable of being operated lawfully’. Fair Play For Women first raised this issue in 2017, and we have been doing so ever since. The judicial review against the policy was brought, anonymously, by a female prisoner. We gave a witness statement, drawing on our research, which was used in evidence in the case. 

The MOJ’s transgender prison policy relies on risk assessment. 

Most transgender male prisoners don’t get moved into a female prison. The ones who do are those who are deemed ‘safe’ or those who have changed their birth certificate to become legally female. Of that second group the ones considered ‘unsafe’ must sleep away from women in their own special accommodation block. During the day when they mix with women they are supervised by prison staff. The MOJ claims this risk mitigation approach fairly balances the rights of both the trans prisoners and the women, and the court agreed. We remain convinced it does not. Women’s physical safety is considered, but their psychological well-being is not. Imagine the mental trauma some women will suffer when forced to share their space with fully-intact male prisoners who are known to have physically and sexually assaulted women.

What positives can we take out of this case? 

Actually, quite a few. First, there has been extensive media coverage (here’s a radio interview we did) with predictable horrified reactions from most people who hear about it. It defies common sense to imprison women with any males, especially those with sexual assault convictions. Second, the court ruled on “lawfulness, not the desirability” of the policies. The policy may be lawful, but this doesn’t mean it’s right or that another approach would not be equally lawful. There is still lots of room here to lobby the government to change its approach to women in prison.

Let’s look at the judgement and its implications.

  • Bad data. The judgement highlights serious inadequacies in the way the prison service counts transgender prisoners. This is something Fair Play For Women first highlighted back in 2017. Improvements will now be required. Prisoners with a GRC will now be counted for the first time.
  • Rights are a pie. The judgement also finally puts to bed the trans-activist claim that “Trans rights and female rights are never in conflict”. The court was clear that the decision to house male prisoners who identify as women in female prisons does impact women.
    • The court agreed that women prisoners may indeed “suffer fear and acute anxiety” when sharing prison space with fully intact male prisoners, and that the psychological impact is likely to be “significant”, and made worse if that male has a history of physical or sexual violence against women.
    • Importantly, the court also recognised the potential for a policy that permits the inclusion of male prisoners who identify as women may violate the human rights of women in prison, specifically article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment).
    • Nevertheless, these potential harms must be offset against “the rights of transgender women in the prison system”.
  •  “Transwomen are not women”. The court accepted our evidence that shows transgender prisoners are more likely to have a history of sexual offending that women, and that their general inclusion in the women’s prison estate would therefore lead to increased risk for women. In other words, transwomen are not like women. Their sexual offending patterns are more in line with other males, and not females. As such, significant risk mitigation procedures must be in place before any trans-identifying male is allowed into a women’s prison.
  • Women’s concerns are not transphobic. The court accepts that women’s concerns are ‘‘fully understand[able]’ and widely held, indeed “Many people may think it incongruous and inappropriate that a prisoner of masculine physique and with male genitalia should be accommodated in a female prison in any circumstances”. It’s not transphobic. It is a perfectly reasonable and grounded concern.

In short: We’ve been saying this for years, but at last the high court agrees that there are conflicting rights here, and getting the balance wrong runs the risk of women being discriminated against. Women are stakeholders in transgender policy and it’s not transphobic to raise concerns. And case-by-case risk assessment is what now shields women from harm.

We say: without proper data, and without knowing the full extent of the impact on women, how can these competing rights be balanced properly? And when does a female’s right to safety override the feelings of males? Where do we draw that line and who decides?

What needs to happen next?

We need accurate data. Research must now be commissioned to evaluate the real impact on women in prison. Fair Play For Women was the first to reach out to women inside prison, but this isn’t enough. We need high-quality academic studies that ask women in prison what it’s like. What works and what doesn’t.  We need to know the real cost women in prison are being expected to pay to accommodate males. Only then can we start to understand whether the transgender prison policy is fair or not. This must now be the MOJ’s priority. Fair Play For Women and others will hold them to account on this. 

Next, politicians must now get properly involved. The law says the prison service must balance different rights. Where that balance is struck depends on how much weight society gives each set of rights. We need a public debate on the value of women. Society should decide where it wants the fair balance of rights to lie, not ‘expert panels’ in the prison service. The current policy may be “capable of being operated lawfully” but is that really good enough? You can help us by writing to your MP and telling them what you think.

No to sex offenders. The government has decided that the right of a male sex offender to associate with women can sometimes be greater than a woman’s right not to be forced to associate with a known male sex offender. We say that balance is wrong. A history of sexual offending should preclude all males, irrespective of identity, from ever getting into a prison for women. Fair Play For Women will continue to lobby for changes to the policy.

In bringing this case, one brave prisoner has ensured the MoJ must at the very least take this issue seriously and track transgender prisoners, and the impact on women, properly. The fight to fix this flawed policy has taken a step forward.

You can take action. Write or email your MP or MSP, telling them you are concerned about the safety of women in prison under this policy. Use examples, like Karen White, to show that this has been abused by violent men. The objection is not about those who identify as trans, it’s about letting males into women’s prisons.

Filed Under: Prisons

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • World Athletics announcement is a game-changer
  • Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.
  • Transgender inclusion in sport is not ‘fair’ when all champions will be young adult males
  • Female-only sport: what does the law say?
  • A speech to the Spanish Senate on fairness in women’s sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Sport timeline: how did we get here?
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings