• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Sport / Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study

Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study

24th January 2023 by FPFW

Testosterone suppression is largely discredited, with seventeen published papers showing that it does not remove male advantage, even after many years. Yet some world sports federations are trying to keep it. These include UCI (cycling), World Athletics and World Rowing. They cite a single study, Roberts (2020). Here is why their reliance on that study is erroneous and potentially irresponsible.

The Roberts study is called “Effect of gender affirming hormones on athletic performance in transwomen and transmen: implications for sporting organisations and legislators”. The authors reviewed fitness test results and medical records of 29 transmen and 46 transwomen who started cross-sex hormones while in the United States Air Force. They compared the fitness test results of the transwomen and transmen with the average performance of all women and men under the age of 30 in the USAF over a ten year period. They were not following a group, only reviewing a file of test results.

A fitness test is not a competition

Military fitness tests are not sports competitions. They are tests to ensure everyone is fit enough. The expectation is that most participants will pass, without having to exert maximal effort. This is a test that covers staffers who do desk jobs. It’s not the SAS. It may work well to ensure minimum fitness level for the USAF but it is not remotely comparable to a competitive sports event.

The fitness test consists of a 1.5 mile run, sit-ups for one minute and push-ups for one minute. For each of these three tests, there is a minimum target, which differs by sex and age. For example, men aged 35-39 must do 34 sit-ups and 21 push-ups. Women in the same age band must do 24 sit-ups and 10 push-ups. They get more points for exceeding these but they don’t have to, and it makes no difference. For the 1.5 mile run, men aged under 25 have to run 1.5 miles in 15:50 (minutes:seconds) and women in 18:56. That’s a 10 minute mile for young men and 12 and a half minutes for young women. These are easy targets. Almost everyone exceeds the target. It’s like a race where everyone jogs across the line together.

The study draws only one simple conclusion

The study concludes that 12 months of testosterone suppression is not enough to remove male advantage. No sh*t Sherlock. That is the only conclusion. Yet this is being relied on by international sporting federations to adopt a new testosterone suppression rule, 24 months, as if that makes a difference. This is because there is one graph in the Roberts paper (figure 2, see below) that appears to show that after two years the transwomen perform the same number of push-ups as the women. Nothing else in the paper supports this. In fact, all the rest contradicts it.

Roberts magic chart
Roberts Figure 2

 

The study doesn’t add up

There are some big questions over the validity and reliability of the data set to draw any conclusions at all. A detailed analysis is being done by academics with the raw data used by Roberts et al. Here are a few examples of why this study should not be applied to sport.

1. Transmen outperform males in this data.

Really? Females taking testosterone do not outperform men in real life. East German women who were doped to win medals never got near male performances. Transitioning women seeking a male appearance take higher levels of testosterone than doping athletes not wanting to be caught, but they do not grow taller, bigger-boned, bigger-lunged, narrower-hipped. They do not achieve male performance in any other study except this one. In the graph above, transmen outperform men on sit-ups. Maybe that’s because in this study the men were not working flat out, only doing enough to pass their fitness test, while the transmen had something to prove. If we accept Roberts makes the case for trans-identifying women in female sport after 24 months, then it also makes the case for keeping trans-identifying females out of male sport because they would have an unfair advantage. No one has ever argued that.

2. The participants were not followed for a fixed period or tested at fixed intervals.

The report says, “We followed participants for 394 +/- 288 days”. This means that on average participant data spanned 394 days, or 13 months, with some participants’ data being only 104 days apart (394-288), less than 4 months. It’s not possible to extract a coherent picture from such a jumbled set of data.

3. The magic graph is being misread.

Fans read it as if it shows neat 12-month intervals for the data. But that was not the case at all. The tests are not at 12 month intervals, but within 12 month windows. This is apparent from the legend on the x axis, 1-2 years, 2-3 years. The authors used whatever data was available. Consequently, the neat and tidy magic graph is not what it seems.

There is nothing in this study to justify setting aside all the other evidence, from all the other studies, that it is not fair to allow males, whatever their gender identity or hormone levels, into female sport. This is not a basis for setting worldwide sport policy.

The difference between men and women has never been hormone levels. This is common sense. Yet somehow testosterone was picked as the differentiating factor. It is one male-female difference, certainly, one of many. It’s not what separates men and women. Measuring testosterone levels has never been needed to decide who goes into which events. It’s past time for this flawed policy to be dropped worldwide.

World Athletics proposed new transgender policy fails women

Rowing policies make no sense

A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in women’s sport

Sport policy: do we need more evidence?

Filed Under: Science and statistics, Sport

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings