• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Law / Stonewall’s non-binary demands undermine women’s protections

Stonewall’s non-binary demands undermine women’s protections

22nd January 2021 by FPFW

Demands for recognition of “non-binary” people seem benign, even constructive. After all, many women don’t conform with society’s gender stereotypes. Without a full face of make-up, a skirt and high heels, aren’t you a bit non-binary too? Of course people should be protected from unfair discrimination because they don’t conform to the expectations of their gender  – and evidence is that women are still having to fight against this.

But calls to legally recognise ‘non-binary’ people could be a back door to the erosion of single-sex spaces and services for women and girls. “Non-binary” is being used to divide the world into male and non-male – and women lose out.

Stonewall, Scottish Trans Alliance and other pro-trans groups have moved on from calling for the end of the single-sex exemptions in the Equality Act, as they did in their submissions to the Women and Equalities Committee in 2015. This is welcome. But the demands for inclusion of non-binary in the Gender Recognition Act create a new threat to single-sex spaces.

They are now calling for recognition of “non-binary” people in the Gender Recognition Act and in the Equality Act, as shown in their submissions to the current inquiry by the Women and Equalities Select Committee (WESC),  published on the UK parliament’s website. 

Stonewall strongly believes that non-binary identities should be accommodated in a reformed GRA.

The protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’ in the Equality Act 2010 covers most binary-identified trans men and women, with or without a gender recognition certificate. However, non-binary people are not currently explicitly protected by the Equality Act.

Stonewall recommends that the UK Government acknowledges the Tribunal’s ruling, and clarifies that non-binary, gender-fluid, and gender-diverse people are covered by the Equality Act under the protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’.

Stonewall

Calls to include non-binary people under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment in the Equality Act would protect such people from discrimination based on their gender identity. Calls to include them in the Gender Recognition Act are an entirely different matter. This would mean someone would become sexless in the eyes of the law. There is no one who does not have a birth or biological sex. The law should not be used as a tool for identity validation.

If people are allowed to opt out of having a legal sex, how are they to be treated under the protected characteristic of sex in the Equality Act? Would opting out of being legally male confer the right to access women’s male-free spaces such as female-only changing rooms and female-only sports? That is what trans lobby groups are asking for. 

In their submissions to WESC, and more generally, several lobby groups claim that non-binary people should be entitled to access women-only spaces. It’s hard to fathom why this should be, since by definition a non-binary person claims to be neither a man nor a woman. 

A woman’s space must permit access to trans women and non-binary people who wish to access the space.

LGBT+ Consortium

Guidance must make clear that trans and non-binary people should be permitted to access single sex spaces, unless there is a proportionate and legitimate reason for not allowing this- which should be decided on a case-by-case basis.

A woman’s space must permit access to trans women and non-binary people who wish to access the space.

LGBT Foundation

There is growing expectation that ‘non-binary’ people belong in women’s spaces. We are already seeing women-only scholarships and sports stating that trans and non-binary people are welcome.

In the arts, commissions, grants and festivals promote “women, trans and non-binary writers”. All this does is make the women’s section for everyone except those identifying as men – that is, it becomes something for all the non-men, reducing access and opportunity for females.

Single-sex exceptions were designed in part to provide opportunities for the female sex, who are under-represented in many aspects of public and professional life. While female ‘non-binary’ people belong in the category, ‘non-binary’ males would not.

This is another example of how provisions for female-only spaces and services in the Equality Act are being undermined by trans activists. Women and girls need the government to issue better, clearer, stronger guidance to protect our sex-based rights.

Filed Under: GRA consultation, Law

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings