• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Sport / Rowing policies make no sense

Rowing policies make no sense

28th December 2022 by FPFW

rowing policies

Transgender inclusion policy is about finding a place in sport for people who reject their natural place in sports organised according to the sex binary, based on their male or female body. But it’s also about who is eligible for the female category, specifically, whether non-females should sometimes be allowed in if they say they are women. This makes it women’s business. The female category exists to ensure fairness of opportunity for those who lack all the male performance advantages conferred by a testosterone-driven puberty. Identity has never been a factor. A look at transgender inclusion policies in one sport, rowing, shows how confused the decision-making has become.

Rowing is very much a “gender-affected” sport, with separate men’s and women’s events at all levels. The UK and the USA are two of the major rowing nations, and they have recently published updated transgender inclusion policies. These policies are quite different.

British Rowing uses testosterone suppression

British Rowing allows males into female events, provided they reduce their testosterone. This means they know males have an advantage, otherwise why the testosterone suppression. The policy states “Our aim in the following criteria is to be inclusive of trans or non-binary people, as far as is possible, whilst balancing fairness in competition.” But the Sports Council guidance says there is no balancing fairness and inclusion. Governing bodies have to choose. All the evidence says testosterone suppression in adult males removes only a little of their advantage over females. This isn’t surprising, since puberty changes both male and female bodies in many ways. Circulating testosterone in adult males is not required to maintain those changes; men don’t shrink, lose their deep voices or grow a wider pelvis if testosterone is suppressed. So, British Rowing knows there is male advantage and makes a token effort at fairness. Its rationale is that World Rowing uses this policy. But World Rowing operates elite events only, with active anti-doping and compliance measures at every event. By contrast, almost all rowing events in the UK are run by volunteers, with no testing and no proof of identity, never mind testosterone levels.

US Rowing goes for self-identification

If the British Rowing policy looks bad, have a look at US Rowing’s new policy.  You pick your “gender” at the start of the season, and you’re done. No more fair racing for females then, because any male can declare themselves a woman and race in women’s and girls’ events.

There is one exception in the US Rowing policy. It is for mixed crew races, which require equal numbers of male and female rowers in each boat. In those events, the females must be “assigned female at birth”. Yes, they can see that letting males claim female seats in the boat gives that crew an unfair advantage, but in this case it affects their male opposition, so it’s not allowed. This means that a single trans-identifying male could be counted as a woman in one race and as a man in another, at the same regatta, on the same day. It’s hard to imagine the discussion that concluded that female events can include males who say they are women but in a mixed crew those males will be counted as men. Didn’t someone cry “transphobic”?

No chance of fairness for junior girls, or for women

For under 16s, both US Rowing and British Rowing allow self-ID. They must know that top boys are faster than female world champions. In indoor rowing, the women’s world record for 2k is 6:21.1. The male record for the 13-14 age group is 6:16.7. US Rowing of course allows self-ID for all ages, not just under 16s. So every female national indoor record-holder can expect to be replaced by a male soon enough, because that male doesn’t have to be very good. Being male gives on average a 10% advantage over a woman of the same age and ability. There are hundreds of male rowers who can beat the fastest woman in their age group.

UK law enables fairness in sport, but British Rowing rejected it

British Rowing ignored UK law which permits sex-based sport and followed World Rowing instead, with pointless testosterone suppression as a fig leaf for fairness. Even “non-binary assigned male at birth” are now welcome in women’s events. Why would they want to? If it’s all about identity, this should never arise.

British Rowing doesn’t need to do this. Their two categories are Open and Women’s. Anyone can race in Open without restriction. No need to declare your sex or identity. This Open category provides a handy back-up option for male trans and male “non-binary” who miss their testosterone limit, as the policy cheerfully points out. There isn’t a Men’s category in British Rowing events, but that doesn’t stop men from racing; presumably their gender identity is deemed irrelevant.

Unlike British Rowing, US Rowing didn’t follow their world federation. They both had a choice. Both, with different policies, have removed fairness for females. All women’s races can now be mixed sex, while US Rowing keeps men’s racing fair, whether men’s events or mixed.

Of course there are appeal processes if you think it’s not fair. But only for the trans competitors, not for females. This alone shows how one-sided the thinking is. In any case, umpires have been given no guidance or training on these policies, or how to respond if they see a male in a women’s race. The British Rowing policy has a heavy-duty statement about confidentiality which would give anyone pause – though it’s never clear what secret is being kept.

These rowing policies are driven by gender ideology not reason or evidence

Gender identity trumps sex even in allocating overnight accommodation. No privacy for girls then. US Rowing policy recommends recording gender identity – and “what are your pronouns” – instead of sex. British Rowing also has a section explaining that “Pronouns are words that stand in place of a name such as she/her he/him they/them per/pers. If you are not sure what pronouns to use, offer your own pronouns first, and then use gender-neutral language.” Perhaps the first time ever that a sporting policy included a grammar lesson, followed by one on etiquette. By contrast, the implications for safeguarding are not considered. This is par for the course when it comes to transgender policies in sport. British Rowing’s confusion is apparent when its policy refers to people “whose gender identity was not female at birth”. How would one know a baby’s gender identity?

What a dog’s dinner. World Rowing, US Rowing and British Rowing all have different policies. They can’t all be right. What they have in common is they all make women’s events open to males. Gender identity & expression is irrelevant in sport. It’s bodies that move boats, not hair and nails. Of course there are no issues with females who identify as men competing in the Men’s events in the USA or in the Open events in the UK. Nor is the lack of a validating Men’s category seen as a problem for them.

We know there are males of all ages racing in women’s crews at all levels. Every seat is taken from a woman or a girl. Most sport is not Olympic, or for money. It’s for personal satisfaction and enjoyment. Do women and girls deserve that less than males who feel they are women? What is fair sport if not rules-based? With these policies, the women’s indoor world record could be claimed by a teenage boy or a man in his fifties. No hormones or legal documentation required, just a declaration that he feels like a woman. Whether this happens or not is irrelevant. Rules that allow it are clearly not fit for purpose.

Read more:

A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Transgender inclusion leads to female exclusion

Sport timeline: how did we get here?

Filed Under: Sport

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings