• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Sport / England Rugby’s Transgender policy proposal – External Consultation by the RFU

England Rugby’s Transgender policy proposal – External Consultation by the RFU

31st March 2021 by FPFW

Today England Rugby has launched a two-week external consultation on its proposed transgender inclusion policy. A link to the survey and a promotional video to accompany the draft policy can be found here. Our submission to the consultation is here.

In contrast to the World Rugby decision to restrict elite women’s rugby to female players only, the RFU will continue to allow male people who identity as women to play community women’s rugby.

In their promotional video they say:

“The policy aims to strike a balance between fairness, inclusion and safe participation.”

“The RFU has considered measures to safeguard and mitigate as far as reasonably possible any risks to players”.

Here’s the problem. “Striking a balance” means accepting a trade-off in safety and fairness for one group (female players) to enable the inclusion of another group (male-born trans-identifying players).

They acknowledge there will be some loss in safety and fairness for females

“Research has suggested that even after hormone therapy there may still be differences between transgender women and cis women in strength and speed”

They also say something quite silly and disingenuous

“While this may indicate a potential performance advantage, up to this point research does not suggest that size has an effect on injury risk”

It’s the disparity in size and strength that matters – something that is more likely to happen when males and females are on the pitch together.

They also say something in the video that is unnecessary and wrong

“We understand there are several misconceptions about transgender participants in rugby as well as in wider society”.

They do not elaborate on what these misconceptions might be.

They admit males do retain an advantage but tell us it’s too difficult to measure.

“While strength and speed have been identified as a potential performance advantage for transgender women – testing and the comparison of data is especially challenging in the community game”

Despite their claims that size doesn’t correlate with injury risk they say they will measure height and weight instead

“Height and weight criteria provide easily measurable and comparable markers”

170 cm (5’7″) is pretty short for an adult male so for most transwomen this will trigger a ‘coach assessment’. Sounds promising but they provide no details on how the RFU-appointed coach will assess the potential for “safety risk”‘ or “performance advantage”

“Such assessment must be completed to the satisfaction of the Panel”

They make no reference to how much “safety risk”‘ or “performance advantage” is considered too much. This policy fudge is both undefinable and unimplementable. It’s unlikely the panel would ever dare exclude someone and risk having to justify that decision in court.

So what may look at first glance to be a step towards protecting safety and fairness for its female players, is nothing more than a fig-leaf. RFU has simply taken its decision making process behind close doors making it both unaccountable and unchallengeable.

They also fudge things for children playing rugby. No clear rules at all meaning the panel has the discretion to allow teenage males to bypass the testosterone requirement and play age-grade rugby with girls.

“For age-grade players, a more flexible approach to the application process may be taken by the panel”

This is in direct conflict with its own very strict sex-based safeguarding rules for rugby. The RFU’s Age-grade Code of Practice states mixed-sex rugby is only permitted until age 11. The trans policy undermines this important safety principle by facilitating mixed-sex games for children over the age of 11.

The RFU also gives the panel discretion to allow female players who identify as men to take testosterone and still play in the WOMEN’S game. This goes against anti-doping rules and presents yet more safety and fairness concerns for the other female players.

So that’s 7 male players and up to 4 females on steroids currently playing women’s contact rugby. Plus there is no obligation on a player to inform the RFU of their trans status. So how many new players simply turn up and register as women and play under the radar.

In conclusion, this draft policy tries to do the impossible and inevitably fails. There’s simply no known method to reliably monitor and ensure safety and fairness for females while also allowing some males to play women’s rugby.

This is after all why we have male and female teams in the first place. Separating by sex already delivers the fairness and safety women need to be included in rugby.

World Rugby understood this. Disappointingly, it seems RFU do not.

 

Read More:

Fair Play For Women invited to speak at landmark World Rugby transgender workshop
Our statement on the World Rugby draft trans policy
Most people agree that women’s sport should be for females only
Lowering Testosterone for 12 months does not reduce strength in males

Filed Under: Sport

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • World Athletics announcement is a game-changer
  • Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.
  • Transgender inclusion in sport is not ‘fair’ when all champions will be young adult males
  • Female-only sport: what does the law say?
  • A speech to the Spanish Senate on fairness in women’s sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Sport timeline: how did we get here?
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings