• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Guest posts / Are Lesbians Welcome at Pride? The answer at Lancaster Pride is no.

Are Lesbians Welcome at Pride? The answer at Lancaster Pride is no.

1st July 2019 by FPFW

Guest post by Greater Manchester ReSisters.

We are a group of lesbian women (and a couple of allies) from Lancashire and Greater Manchester Resisters who attended Lancaster Pride on June 22nd to demonstrate support for lesbian visibility and protest the pressure on lesbians to accept people with penises as dating partners. We faced a barrage of hostility, which, shockingly, was supported by Pride organisers, and members of the LGBT establishment.

You can watch a full video of the protest here.

 

We came with banners bearing the simple messages: “Lesbians are female homosexuals,” and “Lesbians don’t have penises,” and stood on the steps of the Town Hall. We were not in the way of anyone, but wanted our message to be heard, as members of the LBGT community.

We conducted our protest peacefully, using a handheld megaphone to speak from our vantage point of high visibility across the main square. All of our speech was factual and did not express hate, or include swearing or personal insults. We called out, ‘lesbians matter!’ ‘Lesbian rights matter,’ ‘lesbians don’t have penises’ and, ‘pro woman not anti trans!’

Initially, passers-by mainly watched and listened, then people started to approach us to try to get us to desist in an initially condescending, then increasingly aggressive manner.

A crowd began to gather on the other side of the road, making rude hand gestures, shouting and swearing angrily at us. Within minutes, around 40 people had surged right to the top of the steps, and surrounded us, chanting over us, and holding up flags to block our signs from public view.

Local aspiring Labour politician Dominic Casoria boasted on twitter that he led the group to “stand in front of the transphobes” and “drown them out”. This tweet got 4,000 likes including from many luminaries of the LGBT establishment.

Jan Gooding, the Chair of Stonewall tweeted, “thank you. Exactly the right instinct!”.

Steve Taylor, Board Member of Europride and and Head of Special Projects at Pride in London tweeted “My #Pride heroes of the day are the amazing young people at @LancasterPride who surrounded the transphobes to obscure them from view”.

Tim Roache the General Secretary of the GMB Union, Ruth Hunt of Stonewall and Emma Dunn of the civil service “agender” network also tweeted their approval, Emma Dunn retweeting a message calling us TERFS.

Pamela Richie of the Women’s Equality Party said, “I’m grateful to people standing up to hate speech in our streets in a peaceful way.”

Mermaid’s Head of Marketing Helen Islan, who earlier this year notably attempted to prosecute Transsexual Miranda Yardley for hate speech against Transwomen, meanwhile called our statements, “exclusionary propaganda”

However as the video shows we were simply a small group of lesbian women calling for the sexual orientation of same-sex attracted females to be respected. There was no hate speech. Female homosexuality should not be an unutterable taboo, especially within the very community tasked with representing us.

Contrary to the many laudatory messages on Twitter, the atmosphere of the counterprotest was neither peaceful nor respectful. Nor did it appear to be spontaneous. While most of the people who surrounded us were teenagers seemingly excited to be part of a protesting tribe, it is evident from the video that there are older people who come in through the back of the crowd and encourage them. “Miss Ivy Rose” a drag queen who was part of the official entertainment also leads the young people in the chant ‘Transwomen matter!’

While most of the teenagers simply repeated the chants they were given, other protesters grabbed at our banners. We were spat at by an adult woman and her Trans partner and some protestors screamed confrontationally in our faces. One male individual attempted to wrestle our megaphone away. The police did not control the situation and did not keep a buffer zone between the crowd and ourselves.

Shockingly, Robert Mee, CEO of Lancaster Pride encouraged the situation. At one point he shouted at us, ‘fuck off you fucking dogs, you’re ruining it’ and can seen holding a corner of one of the counterprotester’s flags and smiling in the protest footage. He later went to tell the crowd of people watching main stage, ‘we made them go away, politely’. In fact we left when the situation had escalated to the point we felt unsafe to continue.

So if lesbians asserting their sexual boundaries aren’t welcome at Lancaster Pride, who is?

On our way to the town hall we passed a brightly coloured shelter which appeared to be a children’s play area with a ball pool and children’s toy box. We were surprised to see it occupied by a group of men in leather costumes and dog masks. One was positioned on all fours attached at the collar while another participant held them on a lead.

This tent belonged Dog House Stoke a group based around the sexual fetish of dressing up as ‘puppies’ with rubber outfits, ‘puppy’ masks, collars and chain leads, and engaging in sexualised puppy play.

We were shocked and disturbed to see young children playing unaccompanied with these men in their tent and made a complaint to the police about our safeguarding concerns.

A more in depth write up about these Dog play fetishists activities at UK Prides can be found here.

Both the ambiguous presentation of the pups tent (is this an adults oriented activity or a children’s play area?) and the whipping up of a group of excitable teenagers into an angry mob were an enormous dereliction of concern for the well-being of children by the organisers of Lancaster Pride, and show a flagrant disregard for the idea of sexual boundaries.

Whilst Lancaster Pride promotional materials states, ‘all are welcome,’ we lesbians certainly did not receive a welcoming reception. Organisations and individuals that have presented our beliefs as hateful are contributing to the climate of hostility and aggression towards homosexual women which we experienced, and are acting irresponsibly in their duty of care towards children.

We remain unshakeable in our conviction that there is nothing wrong about women loving women, and that children should not be involved in adults’ sexual fetishes. We are proud of what we stand for, the shame belongs to Lancaster Pride.

More on why Resisters felt called to protest can be found on their website www.resistersunited.org

 

Filed Under: Guest posts, Silencing women

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings