• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Sport / Levelling down: How asking the wrong question led to bad sport policy

Levelling down: How asking the wrong question led to bad sport policy

19th July 2022 by FPFW

Now that many sports are reviewing their policies that allow males to compete in women’s sport, it is obvious they got to the old, flawed policies by framing the question wrongly. Trans activists demanded that people who identified as women be allowed to play and compete not just as women but with and against women. 

Instead of recognising that this was about changing the rule on who is eligible for the female categories in sport – something of obvious concern to females – it was framed as being about trans inclusion – on which only trans people and their advocacy groups should be consulted.

Policies were designed to address the demand, how can we include transwomen (born male) in women’s sport? When the real policy goal, still to be properly addressed, is how do we ensure there is a place for everyone in sport. It’s a whole sport question not a female category question.

Having framed the question too narrowly, sports bodies then worked on the wrong task. How can male performance advantage be sufficiently mitigated so that we can allow these people into female sport? Levelling down, in other words. This is quite bizarre in sport, or indeed anywhere. Levelling up is currently in vogue in UK politics. No one thinks levelling down is a good route to fairness, equality or inclusion. Doping is a constant worry in sport because it enhances performance. Advocating the use of medication, in effect doping, to suppress performance is without precedent. 

None of this seems to have raised any flags in the world of sport governance. Never mind that there was no evidence that male performance advantage from puberty could be mitigated. It’s blindingly obvious puberty can’t be reversed. No one seems to have questioned the starting point, that a way must be found for males who identified as women to be included in female sport. It wasn’t if but how. 

Now that this is being openly discussed, it’s become obvious that women should have been consulted. The sport governing bodies that have canvassed their female members, like World Rugby and British Triathlon, have heard that the vast majority of women in their sport do not want to compete against males. No surprise there.

This is why #NoDebate was so central to trans demands. It stopped those affected from being allowed to speak. It made sure women were not asked. Those who dared to speak up were ignored or vilified. That time is over. Sport must ensure there is a safe and fair place for all to compete. That’s done through having categories: by age, sex, ability, sometimes weight. Being excluded from a category where you don’t belong is not exclusion from sport. We are all excluded by age from most categories. Gender expression doesn’t matter in sport. Sex does.  

Since the UK Sports Councils published new, common-sense guidance in September 2021, Fair Play For Women has been asking national governing bodies (NGBs) of the many sports in the UK how they will respond. The new guidance pointed out that people who questioned the prevailing model of trans inclusion – that is, redefining the most fundamental categories in sport to be based on gender identity instead of sex – had been intimidated into silence. This time around, a full range of voices needed to be heard, especially those most affected by this change to their category, namely females. 

We know many women and girls are still afraid to say what they feel for fear of being excluded from their own teams or sports. That is why we have spoken to as many NGBs as we can reach. While some have welcomed our input, others have refused to engage. You have to wonder why. 

We advocate a place in sport for all, based on the objective factors that matter for fairness and safety. That is how we will make sport fully inclusive. Those who have met us consistently report it is helpful to their policy development. Consultation does not require agreement, only listening. Wouldn’t their policies be more defensible if they consulted all sides and then formed a view? We can’t make them listen and we certainly can’t make them change their policies. Even the hostiles only have to go through the motions – as one or two appear to have done. Anyone who won’t even listen to advocates for women has an agenda, and it’s not maximal inclusion. 

The Sports Councils guidance is clear that this time around it is essential to consult all sides, to ensure female athletes are heard and dissenters are not intimidated into silence. Some NGBs are signalling strongly that they will not listen to women who question their current policies. We hope that the Sports Councils, who dispense public money to fund these bodies, will take note of this and take action accordingly.

How did we get here? Here’s the timeline

Filed Under: Sport

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • World Athletics announcement is a game-changer
  • Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.
  • Transgender inclusion in sport is not ‘fair’ when all champions will be young adult males
  • Female-only sport: what does the law say?
  • A speech to the Spanish Senate on fairness in women’s sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Sport timeline: how did we get here?
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings