• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Silencing women / In brief: Why does JK Rowling support Maya Forstater and why should you care?

In brief: Why does JK Rowling support Maya Forstater and why should you care?

20th December 2019 by FPFW

This story begins last Summer when the Government launched a public consultation to gather opinions on whether there should be a change in a piece of law called the Gender Recognition Act.

Some people wanted this law to be relaxed to allow anyone to change the sex written on their birth certificate, with no checks or balances.

This would mean that any man would be able to declare he was born female, with no doctors diagnosis, no drugs, no surgery. Just a form to sign.

Women said no. This would be bad law.

Women’s rights depend on sometimes being able to treat males and females differently because of their sex. To do this we must be able to accurately identify and acknowledge the material reality of someone’s sex.

Maya Forstater participated in the public debate about sex and gender identity, just like we were all encouraged to do during the Government’s public consultation period. She tweeted about her views in her spare time.

Maya believes that while it is right that trans people must always be free to express their gender identity and never be badly treated simply for being trans, that the material reality of their sex cannot and does not literally change. Because that’s impossible.

Although Maya always tries to use preferred pronouns as a matter of courtesy and politeness, she doesn’t think the law should compel her to believe or act as if a trans person has literally changed sex. Sometimes it’s important to acknowledge that a transwomen’s sex is male, particularly when formulating policy or discussing law change for example.

Most people believe this. JK Rowling believes this too.

However, Maya’s bosses disagreed and sacked her saying her views were offensive to trans people.

So she took them to an employment tribunal.

The UK tribunal judge also disagreed and ruled against her.

He quoted the existing Gender Recognition Act that says that a person with a Gender Recognition Certificate has changed sex for all purposes.

The judge interpreted that ‘for all purposes’ must include the material reality of their biological sex. So yes, a transwomen has literally become female in all ways possible and so we are not entitled to act otherwise.

The judge went further to include trans people who haven’t legally transitioned at all, covering the vast majority of transwomen who still have a male birth certificate.

Judge Taylor said “I consider requiring [people] to refer to a transwoman as a woman is justified to avoid harassment”. Paragraph 91.

Although he agreed that Maya’s view was serious and logical it “violates the dignity [of trans people]” and for this reason it is “not worthy of respect in a democratic society”. Paragraph 90.

This means that the law offers no protection from not being sacked for holding these views.

If Maya is not protected, no one is protected.

 

This why JK Rowling has stepped forward to show her support.

And why its been liked by over 150K supporters and counting.

And this is why she is being abused on Twitter.

Dress however you please.
Call yourself whatever you like.
Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.
Live your best life in peace and security.
But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real? #IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill

— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) December 19, 2019

 

 

Some people say that reforming the GRA will not impact women. They are wrong.

“It’s just admin” they say.

This court ruling shows that is nonsense.

It already prevents women from talking about our sex-based rights.

If we can’t name sex or monitor sex-based discrimination we can’t protect or implement our sex-based rights.

Even worse, some people even claim that sex-based rights are ‘transphobic’ and no doubt some will say even this article comprises “hate speech”

That is of course nonsense. That is nothing more than an attempt to shame women into silence.

So, if you hear someone being dismissed as “transphobic” or an organisation being called an “anti-trans hate group” listen to what is really being said. Behind the noisy protests you will find sensible women with legitimate concerns.

We need this discussion to find solutions for all. Stonewall’s mantra of “No debate” has been a roadblock to finding these solutions for too long. Enough.

 

If we are forced to say 'transwomen are women,' women's rights disappear overnight, and we are left with people's rights. People's rights favour men because men are the default people. That's why we fought for women's rights in the first place.#IStandWithJKRowling #TERF

— Helen Saxby (@helensaxby11) December 20, 2019

Filed Under: Biological sex, Silencing women

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings