• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Language / Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.

Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.

2nd March 2023 by FPFW

Fair Play For Women welcomes the publication of IPSO’s draft guidance on the “Reporting of Sex and Gender Identity” but some areas require further work. We will be submitting views via the public consultation on the IPSO website and encourage members of the public to do the same before the deadline of Friday 10th March 2023.

It’s a useful step forward to see the title of the new draft guidance covering the reporting of both “sex” and “gender identity” rather than being narrowly presented as “transgender guidance”. Treating sex and gender identity as two different things is the right starting point for journalists and emphasizes the fact they should not be conflated or used interchangeably. However, the guidance then fails to treat them differently. Generic advice is given, applying to both as if they are the same. This opportunity for clarity is missed in two areas: accuracy and privacy.

For the avoidance of doubt we are using the term “sex” to refer to an individual’s biological/birth sex which is either male or female. The term “gender identity” is a personal and subjective sense of self-identity.

1) ACCURACY

a) Presenting gender identity as if it is sex.

This draft guidance does not address the current problem where newspapers are presenting someone’s gender identity as if it were their sex. This is the one issue Fair Play For Women has raised with IPSO repeatedly and it is disappointing to see this crucial aspect omitted.

The draft guidance notes in its questions relating to accuracy “Is the terminology being used likely to create a misleading or inaccurate impression?”. However, the guidance fails to clearly spell out the potential for everyday words such as “woman” to mislead the audience about the sex of an individual. The vast majority of the public reads the headline “Northwich woman jailed for cocaine-fuelled sex with dog” to be someone whose sex is female, whereas in this case the individual’s sex was male. When an individual’s sex is relevant and important to the understanding of the story is it important that a personal gender identity is never presented in such a way that it can be misunderstood as referring to their sex. Sex is not always relevant to a story, but it becomes relevant when male and female sex differences are known to occur with topics such as criminality, sport and reproductive biology.

It is commonplace to report sex even when it is not relevant to a story. It is surely more important not to misreport sex when it is significant, or even central. A female sex offender would indeed be a big story, so reporting male sex offenders as if they are female is seriously misleading both in the particular and in the general.

b) Misleading language heard in court.

The draft guidance also suggests Editors may wish to consider the names and pronouns used in court. It is of course necessary to accurately report what was said in court, but this draft guidance does not make clear that it is currently the policy of the courts to exclusively refer to defendants using their preferred pronouns (as recommended by the Equal Treatment Bench Book). It is now standard practice in court for defendants whose sex is male to be referred to as either “he” or “she” depending on their preference. Therefore journalists, editors and headline writers should not assume or present someone’s sex based on hearing a name and pronouns alone. Describing a male defendant who is described using she/her pronouns in court as a “woman” without context is likely to mislead the audience about the individual’s sex.

2) PRIVACY

The draft guidance makes clear that the “reasonable expectation of privacy can be affected by the public interest, material in the public domain and the person’s disclosures”. However, this applies to gender identity and sex in very different ways. In the vast majority of cases someone’s sex is obvious and observable, regardless of how an individual may identify. When sex is obvious and observable it is in the public domain and cannot be considered private information. Sex is often relevant and important to a story and therefore accurate reporting is in the public interest. These factors inevitably lower the expectation of privacy an individual can reasonably have about their sex.

In contrast, gender identity is subjective, personal and known only to the individual unless they chose to disclose it. Gender identity can be disclosed verbally by the use of an opposite-sex name and pronouns, or visibly when presenting in a way commonly associated with the opposite sex (e.g. use of wig, make-up and prosthetics). In such cases when sex is obvious and observable the individual’s trans status has indirectly been put into the public domain by the individual.

While sex and sometimes gender identity is clearly in the public domain, there can be cases where someone doesn’t want their sex or gender identity reported in a story. Unlike sex, someone’s gender identity or trans status is rarely relevant to a story. Gender identity is not a predictor of crime or sporting performance for example. This distinction was not addressed in the draft guidance which only mentioned the relevance of gender identity as a factor Editors should consider regarding defendants. Only sex is relevant to allegations and convictions, no one – including women’s groups such as ours – is advocating that the gender identity or trans status of a male rapist must be reported. It is only sex that matters and needs to be accurately reported. It is concerning to see this fundamental mistake in the draft guidance.

EXAMPLE:

All these issues are exemplified by comparing the recent reporting of the conviction of the double rapist Isla Bryson and the tragic murder of Brianna Ghey. In both cases the individual’s sex is male but their gender identity is “woman”.

In both cases sex is obvious and observable, and gender identity has been disclosed through name, pronouns and their presentation. This means both sex and gender identity is in the public domain. In the case of the double rapist, his sex is highly relevant to the story and has been accurately reported by some journalists but not others. If Bryson submitted a first party complaint to IPSO regarding stories referring to him with male names and pronouns it is not clear from the draft guidance whether editors would be safe from a breach of the Editors’ Code. In contrast, the trans status and sex of Brianna Ghey is not relevant to the story and care should be taken by editors regarding this.

To address the omissions in the draft guidance we recommend adding the following paragraph:

“It is common practice to report a person’s sex and age without verification. The sex of a person is generally in the public domain, based on observation and/or history. If neither sex nor transgender status is relevant, then ideally both would be omitted. In practice this may be difficult because of the need to use pronouns and should be at the editor’s discretion. If sex is relevant regardless of transgender status then take care not to mislead by reporting gender identity as if it were sex. Headlines should not use sexed language unless it is important to the story, and in such cases should not use gender identity as if it were sex, unless quoting court statements, in which case this should also be clear. For court reporting, avoid presenting the pronouns used in court as if they were describing sex, and avoid extending gender-based language beyond quoting that used in court.

READ MORE:

Press regulator is failing women with approach to transgender coverage

Inaccurate reporting of sex and gender identity by the press: IPSO must improve its transgender guidance

“Female” sex offenders and “women” committing sex crimes: why can’t the media get it right?

Taking stock of complaints to IPSO about inaccurate reporting of sex

Filed Under: Language

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • World Athletics announcement is a game-changer
  • Our response to IPSO’s draft guidance on the reporting of sex and gender identity.
  • Transgender inclusion in sport is not ‘fair’ when all champions will be young adult males
  • Female-only sport: what does the law say?
  • A speech to the Spanish Senate on fairness in women’s sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Sport timeline: how did we get here?
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings