• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Fair Play For Women

Fair Play For Women

  • Prison
  • Sport
  • GRA
  • Language
  • Changing rooms
  • Resources ▼
    • Take action! Here’s how
    • Key facts
    • UK law
    • Science
    • Sex vs gender
    • Consultation submissions
    • Materials
  • About Us ▼
    • Review of 2022
    • Our aim
    • Our beliefs
    • Our spokeswoman
    • Our history and achievements
    • Our supporters
    • News
      • Newspapers
      • TV Interviews
      • Radio interviews
    • Contact
    • Donate
You are here: Home / Sport / Most people agree that women’s sport should be for females only

Most people agree that women’s sport should be for females only

9th August 2020 by FPFW

To date there have been three official polling surveys in the UK each asking whether transgender women should or should not be allowed in women’s sporting events (Populus 2018, You Gov 2018, You Gov 2020). In 2018 just over a quarter of respondents answered ‘yes’. By 2020 this dropped to just one in five respondents with a concomitant increase in the number of ‘no’s.

 

Media coverage of transwomen in sport has increased substantially in the past two years. Increased public awareness and access to information has coincided with falling public support for the trans-inclusive rules first adopted by the IOC in 2015 and then followed by all major sports governing bodies.

While support for someone’s gender identity is relatively high in the UK – up to 43% agree with the phrase “transwomen are women” – the public can and do distinguish between gender identity and biological sex, particularly in contexts such as sport where the latter is acknowledged as relevant. In such cases it is largely accepted that policies need to be based on an individual’s biological sex rather than on their preferred gender identity.

Notably, around a 25% of respondents consistently answered ‘don’t know’ or ‘prefer not to say’ to survey questions about transgender women, including about their inclusion in female sport. This is unusually high (the norm for ‘sensitive’ questions is around 5% of respondents). Given that pro-trans campaigns have promoted the idea that only trans people can or should comment on trans lives, it’s possible that people felt unqualified to comment, or unwilling to risk appearing ‘transphobic’. Whatever the reason, many people are likely to feel that it’s inappropriate for them to have a view on these questions. This factor should be taken into account when assessing the popularity or otherwise for any policy on transgender inclusion.

In additional to anonymous polling surveys there are other signs of widespread public support to reserve women’s sport for the female sex. This includes a public petition hosted by the US campaign group called Save Women’s Sport currently at over 15,000 signatures. Article 7 of the Declaration of Women’s Sex-based Rights also calls for single-sex sporting opportunities for women. This document has been endorsed by over 200 organisations and has received over 11,000 signatories of support.

In June 2019 over 700 people attended a women’s sport event in London to discuss the impact of trans inclusion on women and girls.

In response to increased public concern and developing scientific evidence, the UK Sports Councils have now commissioned a detailed review of their own 2015 guidelines for transgender eligibility domestic competitive sport. Similarly, when asked about their current policy on transgender inclusion by Fair Play For Women, a majority of sports national governing bodies in the UK say their rules are ‘under review’.

 

Rugby Union may be the first sport to move away from the IOC’s principle of trans inclusion in light of new evidence, but it is unlikely to be the last.

 

In advance of their transgender meeting in February, World Rugby conducted a confidential survey of elite female Rugby player views. They asked 65 players from the UK if they thought transwomen should be eligible for the female game. Less than 10% agreed with inclusion with the vast majority saying no (63%) or don’t know (27%). This shows elite female players share similar views to the general public. Most wish to retain women’s sport for the female sex.

 

 

In contrast, few female athletes feel able to speak freely and safely about transgender inclusion in women’s sport. This is in stark contrast with the ease with which supporters of transgender inclusion can signal their views. For example, an open petition against World Rugby’s new transgender eligibility guidelines containing a number of factual errors has been widely circulated across popular on-line rugby forums, gathering over 15,000 signatories and BBC news coverage.

Whereas, when Fair Play For Women asked to join the popular Facebook page Women’s Rugby Network in order to post information about the topic, our request was rejected. This was surprising considering the fact we had actually participated in the World Rugby transgender meeting itself.  When we asked women in the group if they felt comfortable posting about the issue they told us “I use that group for networking and recruiting for my team and I don’t want to risk getting kicked out of the group” and “I just can’t face the backlash and accusations of transphobia that I know would follow”. This asymmetry of opportunity severely distorts public understanding of the issues.


To date, no female Rugby player, amateur or elite, has chosen to speak publicly to the media on the topic. This reluctance is understandable given the abuse received by other sportswomen, most notably Martina Navratilova, Sharron Davies and Kelly Holmes. Reputational damage inflicted on those who speak out is significant, leading to individuals being reported to sponsors, removed from organisations, and the related loss of paid-work opportunities.

In private, concern amongst sports professionals is high. In September 2019 a private letter of concern was sent to the IOC signed by over sixty British Olympic medalists, world-class sportsmen and women, and leading scientists. The letter asked the IOC to suspend its transgender guidelines pending further scientific study and analysis.

In July 2020, more than 300 current and former professional, Olympic and collegiate female athletes sent a private letter to the National College Athletic Association (NCAA), urging it ‘not to give into bullying tactics’ and to reject the call to boycott Idaho for passing the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act. The law protects fair competition and athletic opportunities for women by ensuring that only female athletes compete in women’s sports. Within days the names of all 309 sports women were published following a leak to an LGBT sports website. This worrying development shows that even official correspondence to sports regulatory bodies can put individuals at risk.

Advocates for female athletes also suffer abuse and condemnation for speaking up. Australian Senator Claire Chandler is being investigated for an alleged breach of the Anti-Discrimination Act for her views expressed in parliament and in print that ‘Women’s sport was designed for the female sex and should remain so”. UK campaign group Fair Play For Women is routinely called transphobic for speaking on this issue, despite these accusations being ruled as inaccurate when investigated by the press regulator IPSO. Most concerning of all, even scientists who have been asked by World Rugby to provide their expertise on this topic are condemned in public and reported to their employers.

The risks associated with sharing views on this topic means that World Rugby and member Unions are unlikely to hear support from amateur players about the new transgender guidelines unless there are pro-active and trusted contact mechanisms in place. However, players tell us that no effective club outreach programme has been undertaken by England Rugby to gather the views of female players and officials on this issue. No player feedback was collected to inform their transgender eligibility guidelines (published May 2019) and the same appears to be true while formulating their position on the World Rugby draft proposals.


The truth is everyone knows that it’s wrong to let male people play women’s sport. We all know it’s unfair and unsafe and excludes women.

It’s common sense but no one is allowed to say it.

 

Filed Under: Sport

Primary Sidebar

Categories

  • Biological sex
  • Children
  • Gender Identity
  • Male violence
  • Scottish GRA reforms
  • Silencing women
  • Policy guidance

Our materials

  • Our factsheets
  • Our short films and animations
  • Our memes
  • Our research

Our latest articles

  • Testosterone suppression in sport: time to drop the Roberts study
  • World Athletics new transgender policy fails women
  • Statement on the UK government move to block the Scottish Gender Recognition Reform Bill
  • Rowing policies make no sense
  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport

Archives

Footer

Prisons, crime and protecting women

  • The facts about transgender prisoners
  • Prisons timeline – how did we get here?
  • Karen White & prison review
  • Sex attacks in female prisons
  • Refuge shelters deeply worried
  • How do women in prison feel about sharing with transgender prisoners?
  • Can you believe what you read about sexual and violent crimes?
  • The judicial review of prisons policy
  • Factsheets

Sport and the human body

  • A progress report on the fight to restore fairness in female sport
  • Biological sex differences
  • Chromosomes, sex and gender
  • The science and statistics behind the transgender debate
  • Guidelines for single-sex sport policy
  • Testosterone suppression in “elite athletes” – what do we know?
  • Safeguarding in sport still matters
  • Male inclusion leads to female exclusion
  • What you can do

Making policy and the law

  • Scottish government is forcing sex self-ID on whole of UK.
  • The Equality Act 2010 and women’s rights
  • GRA reform
  • Advice and guidance for policy makers
  • Changing room policy advice
  • What can I do now?
  • Take Action: Say NO to letting Sex Self-ID in through the back door.
  • Public opinion on the tension between women’s rights and trans demands

© 2023 · Fair Play For Women

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt out if you wish. Read More

Accept Decline Cookie Settings
I consent to the use of following cookies:
Cookie Declaration About Cookies
Necessary (2) Marketing (1) Analytics (4) Preferences (0) Unclassified (4)
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
wpl_user_preference fairplayforwomen.com WP GDPR Cookie Consent Preferences 1 year HTTP
YSC youtube.com YouTube session cookie. 52 years HTTP
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE youtube.com YouTube cookie. 6 months HTTP
Analytics cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_ga fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics long-time unique user tracking identifier. 2 years HTTP
_gid fairplayforwomen.com Google Universal Analytics short-time unique user tracking identifier. 1 days HTTP
vuid vimeo.com Vimeo tracking cookie 2 years HTTP
IDE doubleclick.net Google advertising cookie used for user tracking and ad targeting purposes. 2 years HTTP
Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
We do not use cookies of this type.
Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
Name Domain Purpose Expiry Type
_gat_UA-109881507-1 fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
GASessionCookie fairplayforwomen.com --- Session ---
rtc linkedin.com --- Session ---
_wpfuuid fairplayforwomen.com --- 11 years ---
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient. The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission. This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Cookie Settings